So I generally avoid the topic altogether, unless the reporter appears to have taken more than a cursory interest in some of the issues at play. At least, that's the general rule: Today, I couldn't help but read the cover story of Times of India's weekend supplement, What's Hot, which features a callout box on "What Women Want" that is so ludicrous I simply MUST cite it here in its entirety:
- Women who live between the Ganges and the Yamuna do not like 'lusty practices' like being bitten or having men dig their nails into them.
- Those of Baluchistan like to be physically struck by their men.
- Women of Maharashtra like their men to use foul language while making love; however, women of Varanasi abhor men who do that.
- The women of Patna are demure.
- The fair sex of Avanti (central India) loathes being kissed.
- Women of Punjab can be won over by oral sex.
- Women of Oudh (Uttar Pradesh) make great love potions are are also impetuous in their desire.
- The fair sex of Andhra is very 'voluptuous' in its taste.
- Source: Kama Sutra: The Art of Making Love to a Woman, Pavan K Varma
I really can't make heads or tails of this. Apart from the grossly inadequate assumption that women of certain geographies have uniform sexual preferences, what the hell do some of these comments mean? Are the women of Andhra sapphic, or do they just like fat men? Why (why, why?!) do the women of Baluchistan like to be physically struck by their men, and is it really responsible to assert that they do when, in fact, they may not enjoy it so much as have been conditioned into accepting the practice?
Kya bakwaas hai.
(On a side note, somewhat-but-not-really related, I sometimes call my cat "little Lula," because I give everybody and everything annoying pet names. After about three months of doing so, S informed me that in Punjabi, lula means "penis." Woops. When I told my beloved mum this story, she exclaimed, "But that's what they called your stepsister when she was little!")